Lost

I was just thinking about one of the social aspects of the immigration. What I am concerned with, more specifically, is the ultimate future effects associated with the growing number of Iranians who left their hometown for various reasons after the Islamic revolution. Those reasons are not in the scope of my discussion.

It is obvious that, at the beginning, leaving Iran is very hard for the people who have spent maturity part of their lives with the local culture. Getting adapted to some extent to the new environment, would have definitely taken a huge struggle for them. On the other hand, their children grow with the new values and customs from the time that they can adhere with their own "local" environment.

Now, let's imagine the reasons for the immigration will be resolved someday in the future. Older people will be motivated to go back to their hometown. And, of course, they want to bring their kids as well. But, now it is the kids who will face a lot of struggles changing the atmosphere they live in.

IMMIGRATION has this "double" effect in the case of IRAN. Who is responsible?